A lot of time and money is wasted by organizations because they have a disorganized approach to team building. Senior managers need to use a more strategic approach when it comes to purchasing team building services. Consider the following analogy. Imagine a company has identified the need for 1000 new computers. Would the following not be true?
- The IT department analyzes needs, maybe even interviews users.
- The budget is recommended by IT (perhaps with various options), or provided by management, but based on a real analysis of the situation.
- The same platorm is implemented across the whole company or at least a division or department.
- One supplier is used, which results in a good price to the company.
- The supplier has a very good overall knowledge of the company and its needs.
- A very limited needs analysis is conducted. I would even argue that most leaders dont even know WHY they need to team build, they just know that they need to.
- The budget is unknown or vague at best. Or it is unrealistically low.
- Each group or department does their own activity, resulting in different outcomes.
- Each group/dept uses their own supplier, with no purchasing power from economies of scale.
- Suppliers are not given much background about the company and its team building needs. Indeed, the conversation is usually between an administrative assistant and the provider.

